I again thank the gentleman. Mr. Chairman, by its terms the McCarran-Ferguson Act renders any Federal statute inapplicable to the activities of insurance companies, if, one, the Federal statute does not specifically relate to insurance; two, the challenged activity constitutes the business of insurance; and, three, the Federal statute would invalidate, impair or supersede State insurance law. An examination of these factors suggests that the application of the Fair Housing Act to property insurance practices is barred by the McCarran-Ferguson Act. As I previously stated, the Fair Housing Act makes no mention of property insurance. Secondly, the pricing, underwriting and marketing of property insurance policies clearly constitutes the business of insurance.
Joseph Knollenberg: “I again thank the gentleman. Mr. Chairman, by its terms the McCarran-Ferguson Act renders any Federal statute…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the McCarran-Ferguson Act on the Fair Housing Act during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
the bill before us fully funds the renewal of Section 8 vouchers. Additional funds, especially ones at the expense of critical programs, are simply not necessary. The cost of Section 8 vouchers are remaining constant and in some markets…
I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to a member of the subcommittee, Todd Tiahrt from Kansas.
Well, it states it in reverse, and that is my question. I thank you for the layout of the information here. You certainly raise an important issue, and I pledge to explore the issue with you further.
I oppose the amendment as well, Mr. Jefferson. The State of Louisiana has already received $6.2 billion in CDBG for reconstruction efforts. And yet, the State of Louisiana has yet to submit a plan for the funds, which is required by law…





