I am very pleased, and I know others are too, to hear that an agreement has been reached between the Congress and the White House on the tax cut package. I am especially pleased when I recall the last time Congress and the White House reached an agreement on the tax package Republicans were definitely not celebrating. They were not celebrating because that tax package was the largest tax increase in the history of this country. So today marks a much different kind of agreement. And although I am pleased with the agreement on tax cuts, we should put this in perspective. Now, listen to this. The amount of net tax cuts over the next 5 years will be $91 billion. The amount of spending over the next 5 years will be $9 trillion. Nine trillion. Tax cuts $91 billion, spending $9 trillion. So I would just like to say that this tax cut package is only a first step toward deeper tax cuts, more money in the pockets of Americans, and we also want to have some fundamental tax reform. I cannot wait to get going on another tax cut package.
Joseph Knollenberg: “I am very pleased, and I know others are too, to hear that an agreement has been reached between the Congress and the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the agreement on a tax cut package between Congress and the White House.
Share
More from Joseph Knollenberg
following the full committee amendment process, CBO's scoring of our bill resulted in slightly more than $20.7 million in savings. This amendment will place this funding in the IRS operations support account, which was reduced by $50…
pardon me, but what is the time allotment on the other side and here? The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) has 30 seconds remaining and the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Knollenberg) 3\1/2\ minutes remaining.
first let me state that I am a supporter of the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas program. I think it is apparent from the recommended level of funding in our bill. Mr. Chairman, the President requested that this program be transferred…
I have made my comments pretty clearly. I oppose the amendment. I believe that Mr. Wicker spoke eloquently. I also think that Mr. Olver made it pretty clear that this is not the resolution that we would look for on this particular…





