I would note that CBO previously projected that one of the most effective ways to stretch premium reductions is to have a State option with a Federal fallback.
Fred Upton
The Public Record
Fred Upton is a former U.S. Representative from Michigan, serving in the House of Representatives from 1987 to 2021. A member of the Republican Party, Upton represented Michigan's 6th congressional district. During his tenure, he was known for his work on issues related to healthcare, energy, and technology. He played a significant role in the passage of the Affordable Care Act's repeal and was involved in various bipartisan efforts, particularly in the areas of public health and environmental policy.
I think States need a lot of flexibility and having a one-size-fits-all program has never sort of worked.
It is also true that States have demonstrated that they can take steps under section 1332 to stabilize their markets without new Federal money.
I remain open-minded, but I have serious concerns that this legislation unfairly picks winners and losers, and has the potential to waste valuable taxpayer dollars.
Working together, we have delivered some very big wins--some would call them huge--for the American people over the years.
I have serious concerns that this legislation unfairly picks winners and losers, and has the potential to waste valuable taxpayer dollars.
I hope that I would take you at your word that this hearing doesn't start a precedent of rushing to move new legislation without thorough analysis and oversight.
Sadly, the Senate didn't get it done, but that doesn't mean that we can't keep trying.
I am confident that we can continue our long history of bipartisan cooperation and set aside some of our differences.
The failure to take timely action will continue to strand waste in our states.
We need to complete the licensing process. This has been a bipartisan issue for decades.
It is time to get it off sensitive environmental areas and into one safe place.
When the Affordable Care Act passed, Democrats promised people that their insurance premiums would go down $2,500.
The fact is, this is something we all agree on, and we should and could work together.
Insurance companies were prohibited from denying or not renewing coverage due to a preexisting condition, period.
I hear from constituents in north Texas concerned about not having access to affordable healthcare.
If you believe in Medicare for All, if you believe in a single-payer, Government-run, one-size-fits-all health system, let us have a hearing right here in this subcommittee.
It is unfortunate we are having a hearing that actually doesn't move toward the development of any policies that actually would improve healthcare for Americans.





