I rise in support of H.R. 1 and in opposition to the amendment offered by my colleague from California. I am a strong supporter of the bill before us, H.R. 1, and was pleased to support it in the committee earlier this month. Contrary to what my colleagues may hear today, the bill does not affect the 40-hour workweek or existing rights of overtime pay. It also has built-in protections and safeguards to ensure that employees are not coerced into choosing comptime. The base bill allows employees to decide how they want to be paid for their overtime work, either in dollars or comptime. I once had a job where this policy was in effect, both as an employee as well as a boss, and I know that it works. When I no longer serve in this Congress, I would strongly prefer a job where I could put in a 40-hour week over 4 days and have a Monday or Friday off to spend time with my family, and I would think that that would be a worthwhile and attractive alternative to many of us in this Chamber today. Today I have heard a lot about being forced to choose one or the other. That does not happen. What we want to do is give workers the opportunity to choose for themselves what they want.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for H.R. 1 and addressing concerns about overtime pay and employee choice.
Share
More from Fred Upton
What family doesn't have cancer or Parkinson's or something like that? What can we do to solve the problem?
Well, he's on the tap lift, the short five, I guess you could call it. I don't think the things that he said back in 2016, maybe 2017 really matter much. He's a MAGA Republican.
I thank my very good friend, and I certainly appreciate his kind words. The good news is I am not done yet. We have a lot of work to do, and this is yet one more piece that we are going to be driving forward. But, certainly, I rise in…
I am keeping with the same formula that I had when I came, and that is to work with all of my colleagues on you name the issue.





