I think every great human achievement begins with a goal and the goal for the moment, I think, is 100 by '50.

Do you think that law enforcement is generally in need of more resources for enforcement of impaired driving?

Eighteen million dollars has been appropriated for research and study of PFAS. It is just the beginning.

I am a car girl, everybody knows that. And I believe the U.S. auto industry is home to some of the best and the brightest engineers in the world.

I believe that polluters like DuPont and 3M should be required to pay their share of the cleanup costs.

We just have to fix it. We can't argue about it. We can't debate it.

There is also a bill that I submitted that every public school should be tested for the water.

We have got to find the will and we have got to do it together.

A basic human need to live as a human being is water, food, and shelter, and water must be clean, it must be safe, and it must be affordable.

I also understand that, in addition to DSRC, the C-V2X technology shows great promise...

I am really worried about what is going to happen to it because I am hearing rumors.

I don't see everybody on the same page some days.

And I want you to make sure the Chairman of the Commission knows that some of us are paying attention.

But don't we need to worry?

I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of subtitle B of title III, insert the following: SEC. 3__. DESIGNATION AS HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES…

It is also critical for the future of this planet that we have continued reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

American people are tired of conflict. They are tired of partisan bickering. They want us to get something done.

This hearing today is one of the most important hearings of my congressional career.

I hope, therefore, it's clear to people here that the Trump administration--California is the best way to proceed for the environment, for jobs, and for the future of technology, and there are Republicans and Democrats here who want to…

One National Program for fuel economy with strong reasonable standards that increase year over year and balance between goals of environmental protection and affordability are critical.

I urge you to go back to the table, please.

We need California at the table. We need One National Program, one set of standards.

The administration's proposed rule has listed several options, the most unacceptable being the flatlining of fuel economy standards.

The world has changed from the last time there was a negotiated deal on fuel economy standards in 2012.

Strong fuel economy standards have kept our environment clean, reduced our dependence on foreign oil, and have saved consumers money at the pump.