The administration has proposed we increase revenues so that we can raise the defense budget caps by $26 billion in fiscal year 2015.
Carl Levin
The Public Record
Carl Levin was a prominent American politician who served as a United States Senator from Michigan from 1979 until 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, Levin was known for his leadership on the Senate Armed Services Committee, where he played a key role in shaping U.S. military policy and defense spending. Throughout his tenure, he was an advocate for various issues, including environmental protection and consumer rights.
if the Swiss bank does not want to or cannot comply with U.S. law, maybe it should not do business in the United States.
I understand that the Army is planning renewable energy projects with an energy capacity valued at $7 billion in the coming years.
If the budget caps remain unchanged, however, the Army would shrink to an end strength of 420,000.
What you are asking for is very reasonable in terms of this additional $26 billion just for defense and $56 billion overall for defense and non-defense.
I believe we must pursue just that continuously and with determination in the months ahead.
Burma continues to undergo its dramatic democratic and economic transition, including the release of over 1,000 political prisoners.
Did you find that some Swiss bankers advised U.S. customers to secure transactions under $10,000 which would then avoid triggering cash transaction reports?
It is an unacceptable explanation. That is their explanation. It should not be your explanation.
I will tell you, the $6 billion that was produced was the result of a tough enforcement action that worked.
I have indicated that we hope that treaty will get ratified, but it has its limits, and it does not apply to thousands of accounts of people who owe us money.
I cannot think of anything much more egregious in this area than a bank telling a customer, helping a customer to open up an account in a shell corporation account in some tax haven.
With the effect that it had, which was to make the Swiss operation look more positive than it otherwise would.
These banks operate in the United States. They come here, they get clients here. OK? They have to operate according to our laws.
Well, would you give us a list of the reports that we have asked for that you have not shared them with this Subcommittee and the reason that you have not shared?
Swiss secrecy protections is preventing us from going after behavior which is criminal behavior, allegedly, and is this going to be cured by the treaty?





