This bill is a technical bill that only delays the implementation on both borders. It does not show a preference on one border or the other. It delays the implementation of the rule on both borders, so it is not showing preference. This is very badly needed because of the interests, especially of what we are talking about, because the Canadian Government does not only support moving in this direction, but they want to do it permanently. They are not in opposition to the direction, they just would like to have more instead of less. We are 99.9 percent problem-free. We have an agreement between the United States and Canada that was a border agreement accord which was the framework of the border inspections. I urge Members to support this legislation.
John Baldacci: “This bill is a technical bill that only delays the implementation on both borders. It does not show a preference on one…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a bill related to border implementation and U.S.-Canada relations.
Share
More from John Baldacci
The Texas Compact Act was passed by a floor vote of 309-107 in the House. The Texas compact has bipartisan support in its member States, in Congress and in the Nation. Congress has approved nine similar compacts for 41 States without…
This is not a new concern. Last year the House VA-HUD conference report requested a GAO study of how the VERA system affects the VISNs. We had expected this report to be concluded by this point so we could have the information before…
I rise to issue my strong support for it. The ice storm of 1998 devastated 4 States in the Northeast. The damage was unlike anything ever experienced, and it was severe. This amendment will provide funding through community development…
Their experience is that they paid $400 or $500 for what would be $1,000 in this country. It is no different than what has been happening in agriculture with the pesticides and other types of products that are manufactured in this country…





