this bill is a technical bill that only delays the implementation on both borders. It does not show a preference on one border or the other. It delays the implementation of the rule on both borders, so it is not showing preference. This is very badly needed because of the interests, especially of what we are talking about, because the Canadian Government does not only support moving in this direction, but they want to do it permanently. They are not in opposition to the direction, they just would like to have more instead of less. We are 99.9 percent problem-free. We have an agreement between the United States and Canada that was a border agreement accord which was the framework of the border inspections. I urge Members to support this legislation.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a bill related to border implementation and U.S.-Canada relations.
Share
More from John Baldacci
we recognize that the interest of the public have not been represented. If we look at this proposal that has been put forward by the administration where it talks about just the supply, it talks about drilling in the Arctic National…
this issue is a very important issue to almost every Member of this Chamber, if not every Member of this Chamber, regardless of party. This issue of special education funding is something that we have worked at bipartisanly and in special…
this is really an unfortunate circumstance that we are being forced as citizens of our country to have to reimport drugs that are manufactured in our country under our country's supervision in FDA-approved laboratories, but in order to be…
I have long supported the efforts of Mr. Norwood to reform managed care. Unfortunately, I cannot support my friend's lastest legislative effort on this issue. Instead, I remain strongly in favor of the Ganske-Dingell-Berry bill, H.R. 2563…





