I really have a caveat to your observation because these folks are obviously very intelligent. I am not sure it is a misunderstanding. I think it is an understanding. What they understand is, if you go to this floor often enough and use quotes out of context and use words like extremist and use arguments that are not based in fact, but if you repeat those arguments time and time and time and time again, every night, on TV, on radio, on the floor of this House, some people will buy your argument. Some people will. They understand that. I really think that is a logical extension of your remarks.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the use of misleading arguments in political discourse.
Share
More from Robert Ehrlich
I come here and I watch episodes like we just observed and it is really interesting. I guess my question to you is a rhetorical question. Why cannot folks on the other side simply debate with respect to facts? Why can they not say, look…
Roles models become role models because they set an example. I look forward to working with you and the members of our subcommittee in a bipartisan manner to reenergize the leadership in this society. As I said, not just the political…
It is a pleasure being with everybody. Demagogues hate facts, but truth usually wins out.
Eighty-seven percent support welfare that requires work and is of limited duration. They also support a balanced budget amendment by a huge margin, with 82 percent of union folks in favor of a constitutional requirement that Washington…





