Now, with respect to the substance of this debate, I have a question for the chairman, because I think it is very important that people all over the country understand exactly what we are talking about, and the folks that we are expecting this very minimal work requirement from. Mr. Chairman, it appears from my reading of the transcript that the chairman, in answer to a question by the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Sessions], said that we would require community work for residents not already meeting welfare reform requirements, which is also my view of what the bill says. Is that not correct, Mr. Chairman?
Robert Ehrlich: “Now, with respect to the substance of this debate, I have a question for the chairman, because I think it is very…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the chairman about community work requirements in welfare reform legislation.
Share
More from Robert Ehrlich
I rise to commend this Congress for bringing to this floor important legislation to address the national nursing shortage. This bill, which the gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Capps) has worked so hard to pass, will assist the Secretary…
Only in this town do people think that when we raise taxes we generate additional revenue. It just does not work that way, and the gentleman's numbers speak for themselves. History, the empirical evidence, speaks for itself.
I want to commend my Steel Caucus colleagues, especially Phil English and Pete Visclosky, for their efforts to resolve the steel import crisis. This is an issue of great importance to me, my constituents, and the domestic steel industry…
I believe in tax cuts. I think that the capital gains tax cut break should be zero. However, I am not king. I do not want to vote against this plan, because I like when people like me, because I run for public office. But I say to my…





