We cannot imagine this happening to a $2.4 trillion institution.

I want to hit the very last part of this, and that is the intersection of size with risk with cost.

I am a little skeptical on the point, but I want to open it up to the panel.

So we cannot win the battle against too-big-to-fail just by attempting to make banks safer.

I find that hard to believe, particularly for banks in the United States.

It is unquestionably true that, on average, larger banks are involved in riskier activities.

Mr. President, Republicans are on the attack once again, trying to put women's fundamental rights on the chopping block. I stand with my colleagues to fight back. Senator Patty Murray of Washington, Senator Mark Udall of Colorado, and 40…

Good point.

One of the tools that Congress has given the Fed to combat too big to fail is Section 165 of Dodd-Frank.

Can you honestly say that JPMorgan could be resolved in a rapid and orderly fashion as described in its plans with no threats to the economy and no need for a taxpayer bailout?

I hope you would urge greater transparency by these large financial institutions that are required to submit these plans.