Will the impact on readiness be part of the Department's analysis of alternatives?
According to your previous public comments, the B83 is required to hold certain targets in North Korea at risk.
I find the number of unknowns that we heard before from the administrator and that still seem to be there worrisome.
So, the Administration's Nuclear Posture Review calls for a new low-yield submarine-launched ballistic missile.
I think maintaining our current arsenal and our current programs should be our number-one priority.
I think it's important that it be done by the end of the life extension program.
isn't there some deterrence value in letting our adversaries know that we are actively working to improve our missile defense systems?
According to an article that was published last month, you discussed plans to change how you report Missile Defense Agency testing plans to ...
Maintaining our existing arsenal and our current program of record has to be our priority here.
What kind of testing will you need to conduct to ensure that whatever modifications are made will not impact the safety, security, and effec...
The administration's Nuclear Posture Review calls for two new low-yield variants to our existing nuclear arsenal.