Eli Lilly decided to boost its profits by pushing the drug on nursing homes for uses like dementia and Alzheimer's with no proof that it would work.

I am just asking. If there is no data to support your hypothesis that cutting the time period somehow might improve enrollments, will you commit to going back to the 3-month enrollment period?

Tom Price lied through his confirmation hearing, and now you come in here, and say the same things he said.

Do you think that CEO's, like John Lechleiter, should be held personally accountable when drug companies like Eli Lilly break the law?

I do not think there was adequate accountability.

this Administration has spent the first 11 months of this year trying every trick in the book to destroy the health insurance system in this country.

Do you agree that when a drug company lies about its products, or defrauds taxpayers, it should be held accountable by the Federal Government?

Was the settlement adequate accountability for Eli Lilly's unacceptable behavior?

He pretended that he cared about people being able to get their healthcare coverage, and then he got confirmed, and spent 8 months doing everything he could to take away people's healthcare coverage, and crash the healthcare system.

You could own up to the fact that you want to cut Medicaid and gut the Affordable Care Act.

Your resume reads like a how-to manual for profiting from Government service.

I just want to make it clear for the record. I asked the question about whether or not you think CEO's ought to be held accountable when the companies they are running break the law.

I appreciate your making the point that the opioid epidemic and the lack of paid family leave are holding back workers, and that Congress has to do something on both fronts.

I think I would call that weakening the rule.

millions of families are going to pay the price while the banks end up, once again, getting bailed out and with record profits.

Under Chair Yellen's leadership for the last 4 years, the Fed has adopted a number of rules to reduce the risk of another financial crisis.

To people who are trying to live on those wages, I think that is how they feel.

I am deeply concerned that you believe that the biggest regulatory problem in the country right now is that the rules are too hard on Wall Street banks.

Are there any rules you believe should be made stronger?

This is just a way for Donald Trump to be able to try to get somebody talking about something other than what he's doing, which is advancing a terrible tax plan, trying to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

You know, I really couldn't believe it, that there he was at a ceremony to honor Native Americans, men who have really put it all on the line, to save American lives, to save lives of people, our allies during World War II, really amazing…

If this is a new age of accountability, where Donald Trump wants to be held accountable to the dozen or so women who came forward and said that Donald Trump had forced himself on them in various sexual ways and he thinks it's time to get…

The Congressional Budget Office score has now come out, more information about this tax bill, how it's going to be a big giveaway to billionaires, giant corporations run up the debt by $1.4 trillion and raise taxes for people making less…

You know, he thinks that somehow he's going to shut me up with that. And it's just not going to happen. It didn't work in the past. It's not going to work in the future. I'm going to keep fighting for all the issues I'm fighting for.

The Dodd/Frank law that was passed by Congress provides for succession.