Therefore do I insist that international obligations, especially when war is raging, cannot be evaded, cannot be slighted, cannot be trifled with.
Charles Sumner
The Public Record
Charles Sumner was an American lawyer and statesman who represented Massachusetts in the United States Senate from 1851 until his death in 1874. Before and during the American Civil War, he was a leading American advocate for the abolition of slavery, and after the war he was a key figure in the Reconstruction era, during which he and other Radical Republicans successfully fought to end slavery and ensure basic rights for Black Americans. He continued advocating for racial equality until his death, lobbying in his final days for a civil rights bill that served as a model for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Historians credit Sumner with coining the phrase "equality before the law," which he first used as part of an early attempt to integrate Boston's public school system.
gutenberg.org
I would have that testimony pure, lofty, just, so that we may welcome it when commended to ourselves; so that, indeed, it may be a glorious landmark in the history of civilization.
Whatever any nation does is an example for other nations; whatever the Great Republic does is a testimony.
The dishonesty of a nation is illimitable in its operation.
I can imagine no pecuniary profits, no millions poured into the Treasury, that can compensate for a departure from that international honesty which is at once the best policy and the highest duty.
And be assured, Sir, that interpretation is the truest which subjects the nation most completely to the Moral Law.
International Law is nothing but international morality for the guidance of nations.
Perhaps the international feature of this transaction is the most grave one for the consideration of Congress.
Full well he knew that national character could suffer only where fraud is maintained.
In calling it fraudulent he was not deterred by the petty cry of a false patriotism, that his judgment might affect the good name of our country.
Obviously, plainly, unquestionably, they were for the disarmed belligerent.
Such gigantic purchases, made at one time, or in the space of a few days, could have but one destination.
Who else could need arms and war material to the amount of four million dollars at once?
Plainly these powerful batteries, these muskets by the hundred thousand, and these cartridges by the million were for the disarmed belligerent and nobody else.
It is idle to reject the bid of the open agent of a belligerent power and then at once accept the bid of another who may be a mere man-of-straw, unless after careful inquiry into his real character.
If it cannot be done above-board, it cannot be done clandestinely.
If it cannot be done openly, it cannot be done privily.
But if this cannot be done directly, it is idle to say that it can be done indirectly without a violation of good faith.
In giving these orders he only followed the rule of duty on which the country can stand without question or reproach; but it remains to be seen whether persons under him did not content themselves with obeying the order in letter only…
The individual may play the merchant and take the risk of capture; but the State cannot play the merchant in dealing with a belligerent.
It is no interference with the right of a third party to say that he shall not carry to my enemy instruments with which I am to be attacked.
Now nothing can be more clear than that no neutral nation is permitted to furnish arms and war material to a belligerent power.
Any evasion is a breach, without the bravery of open violation.
This is the supreme rule, to which all else is subordinate.
In the discharge of neutral obligations a nation is bound to good faith.
Politicians like Charles Sumner
