No one should be above the law, despite their mandate under the law to be a neutral arbiter.

If they want to unionize, I am for it. Let's do it.

Being a right to work state means that these workers have the right and they choose to be in a union. I am supporting that choice.

the legislation detrimentally affects employee free choice and stifles basic democratic rights to a secret ballot and free debate.

I am concerned that NLRB seems to be putting their thumb on the side of the scale that is headed toward employees seeking to unionize.

Scripture says, out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth does speak.

Bargaining allows small businesses and their workers to listen and solve problems together, because workers are the ones who know how to do their jobs the best and make the company more successful.

UPS Feeder Drivers, who are paid hourly, currently make $41.59 per hour with most making time and a half.

Forced union dues allow corrupt, ineffective union officials to continue getting paid.

Bargaining allows small businesses and their workers to listen and solve problems together, because workers are the ones who know how to do their jobs the best and make the company more successful.

If they want to unionize, I am for it. Let's do it.

Right to Work does not restrict union organizing in any way.

But it strikes me that doing intermittent and a secondary would be a very a highly effective tool to bring a company to its knees.

The employees of those companies would be adversely affected and their businesses could be brought to their knees even though they had nothing to do with the primary.

No one should be above the law, despite their mandate under the law to be a neutral arbiter.

the PRO Acts' sweeping and far-reaching changes will affect every segment of our economy.

The guy making $500 bucks a day doing what he wishes would now be under a more stringent set of guidelines because of the PRO Act.

Scripture says, out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth does speak.

They vote for a union and it takes 400 days, but because the board is chasing a shiny object and not enforcing this order, that 400 days is allowed to occur, which is not, if you will, an indictment of the employer per se, as much as an…

PRO Act is not pro-worker, it is pro big union.

The guy making $500 bucks a day doing what he wishes would now be under a more stringent set of guidelines because of the PRO Act.

Right to Work does not restrict union organizing in any way.

But it strikes me that doing intermittent and a secondary would be a very a highly effective tool to bring a company to its knees.

Being a right to work state means that these workers have the right and they choose to be in a union. I am supporting that choice.

The PRO Acts' sweeping and far-reaching changes will affect every segment of our economy.