Now, this is incredibly worrisome from a President who should be sympathetic with someone who, under current law, is going to get a 24-percent cut in their benefits.

But do you think it is realistic that he can pay for Medicare, debt and deficit, and also address a 75-year shortfall in Social Security, by only taxing, by only going--the only thing he is going to do is to lay higher taxes on those who…

Now, this is incredibly worrisome from a President who should be sympathetic with someone who, under current law, is going to get a 24-percent cut in their benefits.

That is a lie, because when a bipartisan group of Senators has repeatedly requested to meet with him about Social Security, we have not heard anything on our request.

Of the $4.5 trillion in taxes he has proposed, not a dime is going to shore up Social Security.

But do you think it is realistic that he can pay for Medicare, debt and deficit, and also address a 75-year shortfall in Social Security, by only taxing, by only going--the only thing he is going to do is to lay higher taxes on those who…

Is he aware that under current law, when the program goes broke in 9 years, that there will be a 24-percent benefit cut for those who are current recipients?

Now, this is incredibly worrisome from a President who should be sympathetic with someone who, under current law, is going to get a 24-percent cut in their benefits.

That is a lie, because when a bipartisan group of Senators has repeatedly requested to meet with him about Social Security, we have not heard anything on our request.

the answer is, of the $4.5 trillion in taxes he has proposed, not a dime is going to shore up Social Security.

Right to Work does not restrict union organizing in any way.

If they want to unionize, I am for it. Let's do it.

the PRO Acts' sweeping and far-reaching changes will affect every segment of our economy.

They vote for a union and it takes 400 days, but because the board is chasing a shiny object and not enforcing this order, that 400 days is allowed to occur, which is not, if you will, an indictment of the employer per se, as much as an…

The guy making $500 bucks a day doing what he wishes would now be under a more stringent set of guidelines because of the PRO Act.

Bargaining allows small businesses and their workers to listen and solve problems together, because workers are the ones who know how to do their jobs the best and make the company more successful.

But it strikes me that doing intermittent and a secondary would be a very a highly effective tool to bring a company to its knees.

Right to Work does not restrict union organizing in any way.

I am concerned that NLRB seems to be putting their thumb on the side of the scale that is headed toward employees seeking to unionize.

The guy making $500 bucks a day doing what he wishes would now be under a more stringent set of guidelines because of the PRO Act.

Being a right to work state means that these workers have the right and they choose to be in a union. I am supporting that choice.

No one should be above the law, despite their mandate under the law to be a neutral arbiter.

We don't want employers harassing employees, period, end of story. But nor should it go the other way.

Scripture says, out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth does speak.

Prior to this Administration and the Biden inflation that has gone up 14 percent since he took office, people had money in their checking account.