at the time I expressed reservations about the Gramm-Rudman bill because it excluded some significant spending. In fact, a major portion of the spending was excluded and I felt Gramm-Rudman would not, as a matter of fact, accomplish what it was set out to do.
Kassebaum discusses her concerns regarding the Gramm-Rudman bill and its effectiveness.
Share
More from Nancy Kassebaum
I agree with the Senator from New Hampshire on that. It is not language I necessarily think is necessary. It is not mandatory language, as you know. It is only there as a voluntary guideline. I share the Senator's concern because I think…
this amendment will provide the States with greater flexibility to combine Federal programs into one school-to-work system. It addresses the concerns I raised in my opening remarks about the flexibility that the Governors would like to…
But I would like to particularly respond to the Senator from Massachusetts talking about Professor Gould's role as an arbitrator. An arbitrator's role is very different from that of the chairman of the National Labor Relations Board. An…
Tomorrow our Nation mourns the death of President Nixon, our 37th President. I do not know what history's judgment will be on Richard Nixon. He was a man whose personal flaws became the flaws of a deeply troubled Presidency. But his great…
Other voices in this conversation
