At the time I expressed reservations about the Gramm-Rudman bill because it excluded some significant spending. In fact, a major portion of the spending was excluded and I felt Gramm-Rudman would not, as a matter of fact, accomplish what it was set out to do.
Kassebaum discusses her concerns regarding the Gramm-Rudman bill and its effectiveness.
Share
More from Nancy Kassebaum
I suggest that we have been in the 104th Congress for 2 years. This legislation was introduced in the House some time ago. It would have been useful to us here in the U.S. Senate if this legislation had been before us prior to July 31. We…
I agree, that requirement goes to the fundamental nature and purpose of these important safety net providers. All of the health centers must serve all residents of the area served by the center, regardless of an individual's ability to pay…
I understand how important the loan guarantee provisions of S. 1044 are to the health centers. The States are rapidly moving to managed care systems for Medicaid recipients. In order to continue serving these individuals and other…
I would just like to give an example of why there is concern. A National Labor Relations Board administrative law judge has handed down a decision in the long-awaited Polaroid case. The Polaroid Co. has been heralded as one of America's…
Other voices in this conversation
