Today I rise to commend the Air Capital Chapter of AMBUCS. AMBUCS provides mobility and transportation for people with disabilities. They provide therapeutic tricycles and bicycles to children and veterans with disabilities, and they give…

On Monday of this week, 2 days ago, the President released his budget plan. It will take America's deficits, or total debt, to over $27 trillion. That's a big number. It's hard to get our heads around numbers like that. So I want to talk…

In Kansas, we have got a plant we have been trying to build that has an existing air permit.

Your sum total experience there is precisely zero.

So where did this money go? This regulation required them to--that was a compliance cost. They were forced to burn the million dollars.

Indeed, another way to look at Mr. Bivens's economic error is if I sell something for $5, it is not a zero sum gained, right?

So if we had a regulation that costs someone to take a stack of dollar bills, a million bucks, and burn them, that would be a cost to that business, correct?

If there are no new coal-fired power plants built in America following this rule, would you be willing to at least consider the possibility that it was a direct result of this rule?

Do you think that there will be new coal-fired power plants built in the United States following the implementation of this rule?

Isn't it fair to say that this new rule is a ban on new coal-fired power plants, in effect?

We talked about Logan 1. In fact, there is really no power plant in existence today that can consistently meet the requirements that the new rule would require.

So it is--so that is right, so----