Jerry Moran

That flexibility, and again, I would point out, you said it may take flexibility on the Congress maybe to do something that RUS may need to do something, flexibility is required of FCC, and I still would be interested in knowing how that…

I want to go back to the USF, and its consequences, the alteration of the universal service funds

The waiver is necessary in the public interest to ensure that consumers continue to receive voice services.

Chairman Genachowski has once again said the Congress could solve this problem.

I'm worried about how a company who's trying to make investment decisions...is going to have the certainty that they're not going to have a flash cut

In my view, there are two steps to get our fiscal house in order, and the Congress must make some responsible decisions to rein in Government spending.

I'm worried that the waiver process is at least worded in your order that nearly almost no company would qualify for a waiver

Economic growth is central to both addressing our debt and providing our children with a bright future.

I guess collect and disclose.

I encourage you to hire those people and put them to work as rapidly as possible.

I am discouraged by how long it took for the VA to implement.

General, thank you, for your service to our country and to the veterans. And thank you all for your interest and well being of our Nation's service men and women.

We need to take advantage of the wide array of professional services that are available at every opportunity.

I was pleased to hear the VA announce its plan to hire 1,900 mental health workers.

Who at CFTC was handling the decisions related to enhanced supervision and the kind of bankruptcy or the bankruptcy proceedings?

Did the CFTC have a role to play in those decisions?

Is what you are telling me then that my understanding that--or my suggestion that those segregated account holders were harmed by that decision is not true?

I wish you well in your new position at what obviously is a very difficult time.

I want this to be over the top. I want this to be the best and most lavish sort of conference.

I don't understand how, for example, Mr. Miller, the rooms got paid for.

So when you say a referral, that doesn't necessarily mean an individual is under consideration for criminal charges by DOJ. It could be something broader than that.

How is it that a Federal employee is able to be reimbursed for the room?

This conduct on the part of these few Federal employees is an unacceptable abuse of the American taxpayers' trust.

Were any of the rooms available for $93 a night?

That would be a change in policy at GSA.