I just would encourage my colleagues that if we want to have an opportunity to really move a bill, we are going to have to come together and be positive and just tweak the language and work this through.
John Shimkus
The Public Record
John Shimkus is a former U.S. Representative from Illinois, serving in the House from January 7, 1997, until January 3, 2021. A member of the Republican Party, he represented Illinois's 15th congressional district. During his tenure, Shimkus was known for his work on issues related to energy, environment, and agriculture, often advocating for policies that supported these sectors. He served on several committees, including the Energy and Commerce Committee, where he focused on energy policy and environmental regulations.
I mean, you just can't weigh in. You are not making those cost-benefit analyses.
So they should move. Is that the answer? Get out of that 70-parts-per-billion area because it is not healthy.
We are changing the rules on the fly, and the people who are creating jobs in this country cannot manage it.
I was here when we passed the healthcare law. All we passed was the Senate version of a bill.
This is the perfect example of a nanny state, of a national government telling individual citizens and saying what is best for them.
I don't think I have ever in my life read a menu label. I don't think I have ever looked for calorie numbers on anything I have consumed.
We have great concerns about the change in base load generation based upon the focus of this administration on continuing to ratchet-down emission standards
The House of Representatives has repeatedly supported Yucca Mountain in an overwhelming and bipartisan manner.
The issue of the nation's nuclear waste management policy is not a partisan issue.
Great. I think that is all I have, so with that--and Mr. Igrejas, we look forward to continuing to work with you because obviously we are moving forward.
The discussion draft permits a manufacturer to request EPA to conduct a risk evaluation of a chemical substance.
The existing standard of unreasonable risk has been interpreted by courts to be a risk-benefit balancing
The intent of the legislation is to be, as was stated in some of the opening statements, a more slimmed-down, more efficient, more simplistic process of getting from A to B to C to judgment ruling
Let's continue the bipartisan momentum and get this legislation through the committee and the full House. This is the year for meaningful reform.
Members have been working together directly, challenging each other to find common ground, and discovering that we share many policy objectives.
It's gratifying to work directly with Members on both sides of the aisle who bring so much dedication to the task.





