On the recordApril 13, 2015
The existing standard of unreasonable risk has been interpreted by courts to be a risk-benefit balancing
Source
congress.govThe existing standard of unreasonable risk has been interpreted by courts to be a risk-benefit balancing
Shimkus discusses legal interpretations of risk evaluations.
Share
More from John Shimkus
The American people overwhelmingly agree. Recent polling found Americans prioritize affordability and reliability over emissions reductions.
As ranking member on the Subcommittee of Environment and Climate Change, I want to thank Chief Counsel Mary Martin, Deputy Chief Counsel Jerry Couri, and senior professional staff member, Peter Spencer, for their tremendous support of me…
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission must promptly continue with the legally mandated licensing process