May I just add, we do not have the facts. There has been no prospectus, there has been no study. We do not know on the basis of what has been done what in the world would justify these four courthouses. Now, so we are told to vote in the dark, and then wait and hope that some day some few people out there will ultimately make a decision that is called an authorization. That is voting in the dark, and that is why we have these kinds of over spending that take place. The prospectus could have been ordered long ago by the GSA. It could have been ordered by the authorizing committee. They saw fit not to do so. In fact, OMB turned down one of these courthouses. But there are no facts before us at this point to even debate in regard to the merit of these courthouses in the appropriations.
Harris Fawell: “May I just add, we do not have the facts. There has been no prospectus, there has been no study. We do not know on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of information regarding proposed courthouses during a floor debate.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
Again, no, they are not. The legislation's more explicit internal and external review procedures under ERISA are not intended to expand or contract existing provisions of law. Therefore, it is not intended to have any impact on pending…
I think it is too bad that we have what I would call extremism here as we try to talk about something I hope more rationally. When we talk about the fact that the Goodling amendment, for instance, is going to cause some 10 million people…
The definition of a bona fide applicant, we tried to bend over backwards by saying it is somebody who basically is there who really does not want to work there, he is primarily there in furtherance, primarily, the motivation is in…
I have also heard it said this week that union salting is protected by the United States Supreme Court in its unanimous 1995 Town and Country decision, and that title I seeks to overturn this case which held that union organizers are…





