May I just add, we do not have the facts. There has been no prospectus, there has been no study. We do not know on the basis of what has been done what in the world would justify these four courthouses. Now, so we are told to vote in the dark, and then wait and hope that some day some few people out there will ultimately make a decision that is called an authorization. That is voting in the dark, and that is why we have these kinds of over spending that take place. The prospectus could have been ordered long ago by the GSA. It could have been ordered by the authorizing committee. They saw fit not to do so. In fact, OMB turned down one of these courthouses. But there are no facts before us at this point to even debate in regard to the merit of these courthouses in the appropriations.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of information regarding proposed courthouses during a floor debate.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
I do, indeed, have some troubling thoughts about this bill--H.R. 2746, the HELP Scholarship Act--though obviously well intentioned. The bill is presented as "Parental Choice," but that choice is obviously conditioned upon the right of…
I simply want to emphasize the fact that I believe that what the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Goodling] has presented in all four of these amendments are very reasonable ones, and I think also that I can say that when the minimum wage…
I rise in opposition once again to the Markey amendment. This amendment would zero out an appropriation of $20 million for a very important ongoing environmental nuclear waste reduction research program which is being conducted by the…
this is a good example, I think, of people trying to, in good faith, have an understanding. The ERISA law is very arcane. It is important to understand that the DOL does issue advisory opinions, but they do not issue advisory opinions that…





