I simply want to make it very, very, very clear that we do not in this legislation say that the employer has any right to discriminate against an applicant because the applicant is a member of a union. We make it clear that the Supreme Court decision is not in any way affected. One can also even be a paid member of a union. There can be no discrimination.
Addressing employer discrimination against union members in proposed legislation.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
So under H.R. 3246, Mr. Chairman, even organizers are not prohibited from getting jobs.
I rise in some reluctant opposition here because I believe that the section 501 codification of the Beck decision in this bill is a poison pill. It simply does not do what it does state that it does. It states that it predicates a…
I do, indeed, have some troubling thoughts about this bill--H.R. 2746, the HELP Scholarship Act--though obviously well intentioned. The bill is presented as "Parental Choice," but that choice is obviously conditioned upon the right of…
Mr. Chairman, referring to the interpretive bulletin, which to my knowledge was the very first time that there was an official interpretation of the prudent man rule, they take sections 403 and 404 and they say: Here, we are going to…
Other voices in this conversation
