I think it is too bad that we have what I would call extremism here as we try to talk about something I hope more rationally. When we talk about the fact that the Goodling amendment, for instance, is going to cause some 10 million people, for instance, to lose coverage under minimum wage, I can only shake my head. I would refer my colleagues to the fact that over 200 Members of this Congress, including being led by Mike Espy, a member of the other side of the aisle, a short time ago pointed out that before the passage of the minimum wage law back in 1989, there was $362,500 annually, that is, businesses grossing less than $362,500 were granted exemptions. That was extended and increased to $500,000 at that time, but there was a mistake made. Mike Espy pointed out the mistake that was made.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Goodling amendment on minimum wage coverage.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
I have also heard it said this week that union salting is protected by the United States Supreme Court in its unanimous 1995 Town and Country decision, and that title I seeks to overturn this case which held that union organizers are…
the definition of ETI's, which is the first time to my knowledge that ETI's have ever been legally defined in any of the regulations or in the law, states: Are defined as investments selected for economic benefits they create, in addition…
Mr. Chairman, H.R. 3246, the Fairness for Small Business and Employees Act is a pro-employee, pro-employer, pro-labor organization bill that is also good for the economy and good for the American taxpayers. Having introduced last session…
If this were a court of law, Mr. Speaker, 95 percent of what we have hard would be ruled irrelevant and nongermane to the issue before this body. Because whether one is for the minimum wage or not, all that this bill does is to clarify…





