The more explicit internal and external review provisions under this new legislation do not and are not intended to expand or contract existing ERISA law. Therefore, these new procedures do not and are not intended to affect whether or the extent to which ERISA does or does not preempt any particular State statute. These new procedures do not indicate congressional intent either way about whether Texas law is preempted by ERISA.
Harris Fawell: “The more explicit internal and external review provisions under this new legislation do not and are not intended to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of new legislation on ERISA law and state statutes.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
I simply want to make it very, very, very clear that we do not in this legislation say that the employer has any right to discriminate against an applicant because the applicant is a member of a union. We make it clear that the Supreme…
This is precisely why in all of those instances where exemptions are granted, nothing like this has ever been put into the Fair Labor Standards Act. I want to add also that the gentleman from New York (Mr. Owens) actually is extending the…
So under H.R. 3246, Mr. Chairman, even organizers are not prohibited from getting jobs.
Again, no, they are not. The legislation's more explicit internal and external review procedures under ERISA are not intended to expand or contract existing provisions of law. Therefore, it is not intended to have any impact on pending…





