As I have indicated, first of all in section 1 the gentleman has entirely removed the very clear statement that any promotion is inappropriate on behalf of the Department of Labor. In reference to the other sections of the bill, frankly the gentleman had here a complete new bill of seven or, eight pages, and I have not had the chance to go fully through it, but I have noted that at least statements where we have said that we had proscriptions in regard to promotion, it seemed to me the gentleman had left those out. In fact in section 2 I am informed that those proscriptions have been pretty well deleted.
Harris Fawell: “As I have indicated, first of all in section 1 the gentleman has entirely removed the very clear statement that any…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing changes to a bill regarding the Department of Labor's promotion policies.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
I simply want to make it very, very, very clear that we do not in this legislation say that the employer has any right to discriminate against an applicant because the applicant is a member of a union. We make it clear that the Supreme…
You have mentioned this 50 percent test several times. Who would determine what the level is of a applicant's motivation to work for the employer?
I thank the chairman. So there would be an assumption that we would limit the benefits of this bill, insofar as that one particular district is concerned, to the increase in appropriations for this fiscal year, and not for future fiscal…
So under H.R. 3246, Mr. Chairman, even organizers are not prohibited from getting jobs.





