Today, our institutions of high learning have, too often, turned from being a marketplace of ideas to a dictatorship of ideas.
Steve King
The Public Record
Steve King is a former Republican member of the United States House of Representatives, representing Iowa's 4th congressional district from 2003 to 2021. Known for his conservative views, King was a prominent figure in the House, often advocating for strict immigration policies and fiscal conservatism. He served on several committees during his tenure, including the Judiciary Committee and the Agriculture Committee, where he focused on issues important to his rural constituents. King's tenure was marked by controversy over his remarks on race and immigration, which drew criticism from both sides of the political spectrum.
For the record, I believe I am a cosponsor of both of those pieces of legislation.
Reclaiming my time, I would like to pose a question to the gentleman from Texas. The bill that you have proposed that mirrors the President's executive order to limit people coming in from those six countries, do you have the bill number…
I thank the gentleman from Wisconsin for his statement here and for bringing up the topic of American exceptionalism and bringing us back through some of this history that we need to revisit from time to time. That statement is very…
It is my privilege to be recognized to address you here on the floor of the United States House of Representatives and to once again continue this dialogue that we have with you, all of our Members and staff and the American people. To…
And I would say in conclusion that there's an image in my mind of a bill-signing ceremony for H.R. 1689.
Do you agree that the Supreme Court stripped the three words out of the Fifth Amendment, 'for public use'?
So I am way disturbed by an amendment to the Constitution that has been edited by the Supreme Court with a level of impunity.
I find the bill unnecessary and problematic and, therefore, I continue to have concerns and will oppose the bill.
I find that it doesn't look the same as the one we were discussing in those previous years, and so it seems to be apparent that you have written a new mission statement.
I see that as perhaps a direct reaction to Congress' concern about the expansion of the mission statement.
I have lived through the 1980s farm crisis and the years hence, and I have a feel and a flow for what has happened within the Farm Credit System.
I have long said if you want to do something great for our country have a lot of babies and raise them right.
Jorge Ramos' stock in trade is identifying and trying to drive wedges between race. Race and ethnicity, I should say to be more correct. When you start accentuating the differences, then you end up with people that are at each other's…
Jorge Ramos' stock in trade is identify and trying to drive wedges between race.
You can not rebuild your civilization with somebody else's babies. You've got to keep your birth rate up, and that you need to teach your children your values.
I think we should recognize that, and I think the public should know, and they can make their decisions when they go to the ballot box.
I intend to drill into this, and get as complete an audit as this can be achieved and to examine the implications, especially if there is political motivation that is indicated with where these dollars have been distributed.
I will do my share to achieve that transparency, and I am confident Mr. Cohen will as well.
I believe we have a constitutional obligation to do so, and when billions of dollars stack up without even questioning the motivations for that.
But in consequence for appropriation made by law and a regular statement in account of the receipts and expenditures of all money shall be published from time to time.
I do not remember Dan Glickman's confession to that back sometime in the 1990s, and I do not remember any evidence with regard to that discrimination.
I appreciate your testimony promoting a more transparency, and I appreciate the bipartisan look at this transparency.





