Reclaiming my time, here is another loophole in the Senate GOP bill. Who gets to select that external reviewer according to the Republican plan in the Senate? On page 47, the plan gets to select that, quote, independent reviewer. That certainly was not in the version that passed the House. Here is another loophole. Does that independent reviewer, is that in the House bill a person who has expertise related to that problem? You betcha. What about in the Senate? Only if a specialist is, quote, reasonably available would you get, for instance, an orthopedist reviewing an orthopedic problem. These are just multiple things that you can go through nearly every page.
Greg Ganske: “Reclaiming my time, here is another loophole in the Senate GOP bill. Who gets to select that external reviewer according…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing loopholes in the Senate GOP bill regarding the selection of external reviewers.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
Here is what two law professors from New Jersey say: ``In preempting State law, the Norwood amendment goes beyond conduct that involves negligent medical judgment to a particular patient's case. The amendment may, by virtue of the words…
I wish very much that we had more time to see the language of the Norwood amendment so people could fully understand it. I intend to support the rule. I understand fully how my colleagues on the other side of the aisle very well are upset…
And would the gentleman say that the reason for that is that his bill is focusing primarily on the initial creation of this blastocyst or the equivalent of a fertilized egg and the problems that that would have because we would be…
The events of yesterday, September 11, are forever seared into our minds as with branding irons. We grieve for the victims and their families. We pray for them. Let the word go forth to our enemies. We are united in our resolve to avenge…





