In preempting State law, the Norwood amendment goes beyond conduct that involves negligent medical judgment to a particular patient's case. The amendment made by virtue of the words 'based on' stipulate that State malpractice law does not apply to any treatment decision made by the managed care organization, whether it be negligent, reckless, willful or wanton. For example, Rosenbaum continues, 'no State cause of action could be maintained against a designated decisionmaker for its decision to discharge a patient early from a hospital even if the likely result of that discharge would result in a patient's death. In short, all forms of vicarious liability under State law would be preempted.'
Greg Ganske: “In preempting State law, the Norwood amendment goes beyond conduct that involves negligent medical judgment to a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Norwood amendment on state malpractice law.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
The events of yesterday, September 11, are forever seared into our minds as with branding irons. We grieve for the victims and their families. We pray for them. Let the word go forth to our enemies. We are united in our resolve to avenge…
I wish very much that we had more time to see the language of the Norwood amendment so people could fully understand it. I intend to support the rule. I understand fully how my colleagues on the other side of the aisle very well are upset…
I believe there are ethical considerations that enter to the creation of an embryo for research purposes, and that is why I will support the Weldon bill. And I will vote against the Greenwood substitute.
Let me just read to the gentleman a statement by Ari Fleischer today on this issue. The question to him was: Republicans and Democrats believe that the deal struck between Mr. Norwood and the President would abrogate State laws on…





