Let me just read to the gentleman a statement by Ari Fleischer today on this issue. The question to him was: Republicans and Democrats believe that the deal struck between Mr. Norwood and the President would abrogate State laws on patients' bill of rights. Is that the White House understanding? Here is what Mr. Fleischer said: Yes. Yes. And I think you can get into a good discussion of that at the background. Question: So he doesn't believe that it would not abrogate State laws? Fleischer: There are a certain series of preemptions in there. Does the gentleman agree with Mr. Fleischer's assessment there?
Greg Ganske: “Let me just read to the gentleman a statement by Ari Fleischer today on this issue. The question to him was: Republicans…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a deal on patients' bill of rights during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
I wish very much that we had more time to see the language of the Norwood amendment so people could fully understand it. I intend to support the rule. I understand fully how my colleagues on the other side of the aisle very well are upset…
And would the gentleman say that the reason for that is that his bill is focusing primarily on the initial creation of this blastocyst or the equivalent of a fertilized egg and the problems that that would have because we would be…
As a physician in the earlier 1990s when I was taking care of Medicare patients, sometimes we would do a procedure where it might or might not be considered medically necessary by Medicare. All that we wanted was to know whether Medicare…
I want to salute the passion of the gentleman from Alaska (Chairman Young) and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) and the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski). I know how much all of…





