But there is nothing in the gentleman's amendment that would prevent the FDA from intercepting that shipment, that drug that she had ordered, and testing it, just like they would do if she had ordered it from a retailer in the United States and had it shipped to her home, is there?
Greg Ganske: “But there is nothing in the gentleman's amendment that would prevent the FDA from intercepting that shipment, that drug…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of an amendment related to FDA drug shipment regulations.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
Tuesday, September 11, is forever seared into our minds. We will never forget the images of planes flying into tall buildings and exploding, people choosing to jump off buildings rather than burn to death, buildings collapsing on rescuers…
shortly after the last election in November of last year, I traveled to Hanoi. I spent about a week there on a volunteer surgical mission. I found the people to be friendly and courteous. Make no mistake, though: the Communist government…
let us get into the nitty-gritty of comparing some of the aspects of these bills. Mr. Chairman, I would make a strong argument that the Senate bill has stronger provisions in terms of requirements for screeners than the Young bill. The…
I wrote an op ed piece that said, ``Let me make my position absolutely clear. I oppose the cloning of human beings. I favor Federal funding of stem cell research. The potential this research has to cure disease and alleviate human…





