in my remaining time I want to speak a little bit about patient protection legislation. We have been working on this issue for 5 years now. Back in 1995 when I first came to Congress, reports came out about how HMOs were writing contracts that had gag clauses in them, in which they basically said that before a physician could say to the patient what their treatment options were they first had to get an okay from the company. Now think about that for a minute. Let us say that a woman with a lump in her breast goes in to see her doctor. The doctor takes her history, examines her, and knows that there are three treatment options for this lady; but one of them may be more expensive than the other and because he has this gag rule written into his HMO contract he has to say, excuse me, ma'am; leaves the room goes to a telephone; gets on the phone, dials a 1-800 number and says, Mrs. So and So has a lump in her breast. She has three treatment options. Can I tell her about them? I firmly believe that patient has the right to know all her treatment options and that an HMO should not censor her physician. That is a blow right to the patient/doctor relationship. That should be outlawed. So I wrote a bill in 1995 called the Patient Right to Know Act. I went out and I obtained 285 bipartisan cosponsors and, Mr. Speaker, I could not get that bipartisan bill to the floor, which would have passed with over 400 votes.…
Greg Ganske: “in my remaining time I want to speak a little bit about patient protection legislation. We have been working on this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing patient protection legislation and the impact of gag clauses in HMO contracts.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
But there is nothing in the gentleman's amendment that would prevent the FDA from intercepting that shipment, that drug that she had ordered, and testing it, just like they would do if she had ordered it from a retailer in the United…
I want to salute the passion of the gentleman from Alaska (Chairman Young) and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) and the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski). I know how much all of…
I commend my colleague from Indiana for his persistence on this amendment. We have had this debate a lot. Before I came to Congress in 1995, a few years before that, there was a huge debate on this, and the space station only stayed in…
I have here a ``Dear Colleague'' that was sent out by the gentleman from Georgia on August 1. It says, ``An explanation of how ERISA preemption works.'' It says, ``Under H.R. 2563,'' that is the base bill, the Ganske-Dingell bill, ``if an…





