This is yet another reason that we should get rid of the filibuster, so that we don’t have to have a supermajority to get anything important done in the Senate.

Until Roe v. Wade is overturned by the Supreme Court, women’s right to an abortion should still be protected.

John Roberts at least cares about the institution of the Supreme Court. I think he cares that the Supreme Court is not seen as just some kind of ideological right wing court. I think he cares about that. But his colleagues do not, and…

we need filibuster reform also. At least you have a shot at it if you don’t have to have 60 votes to codify Roe v. Wade at the federal level.

these are all done by a very activist court peopled with folks like the Trump nominees, Trump appointees, all of whom I voted against.

this is why we need to be mobilized at all levels. It is not just Congress that can take action, but it is all of the state legislatures.

we can talk about term limits for the Supreme Court, we can talk about applying ethics provisions to the Supreme Court, we can increase the number on the Supreme Court, we can cycle circuit court judges through the Supreme Court.

there's an appetite for that and the companion bill that 48 Democratic senators signed. I am one of them.

they're letting the Texas law stand. I'm glad you used the word 'abused' because that's exactly what the Supreme Court is doing.

I'm sure they'll try to do both. And so, we're going to need to resort to the court or have I would hope that maybe we can think about legislation that will prevent this kind of subterfuge from happening.

Therefore, Trump, I think really leaned on Jeffrey Clark to do his bidding.