The point the gentleman from Iowa is making is that we have really tried hard in this body to address this problem. We on this side of the aisle, when we were in control and had the majority in the 109th, felt very strongly that first and foremost to solve the problem and ultimately decide what to do with the 20 million that are estimated to be here illegally, is to stop the hemorrhaging. As a physician member, I use that expression a lot, having been a surgeon in my previous life, OB/GYN physician, but you have to stop the bleeding. If you sit there and let the patient continue to bleed, and that is analogous to the porous borders, the 3 or 4 million that continue to come in every year, in addition to the 2 million that the gentleman from California was talking about earlier, then the patient is going to die. That patient, as the lifeblood seeps out of us, is the United States of America.
Phil Gingrey: “The point the gentleman from Iowa is making is that we have really tried hard in this body to address this problem. We…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing immigration reform and the need to secure borders during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Phil Gingrey
An overly restrictive regulatory process will stifle innovation and ultimately lead to erosion in the quality of care.
As educators and legislators, we must not neglect our duties to equip these young people, our children, these students, with the tools and the knowledge to build a successful career.
Paul, I would just like to say that I think a great part of the legacy of your Speakership has been showing civility and character, and I truly mean that. I think everybody in this Chamber would agree with that. We applaud you for that.
I think it is really unconstitutional to say that Congress doesn't have the ability to mitigate as we do under the good advice that you give us.





