Unfortunately, their only input into this CHAMP legislation, as the Democrats originally phrased it in their acronym, their only opportunity, the Republican members of the Energy and Commerce Committee, is to be here on the floor during this Special Order hour to try to educate Members on both sides of the aisle. The PAYGO idea was the Democrat's campaign pledge, that if they had a new program or they expanded an existing program, and this is an expansion of an existing program, that they would pay for it. They would pay for it by either cutting spending somewhere else or raising taxes. So this is one of those programs. This is a renewal of a program that has worked very well. It needs some additional funding. I don't think any of us would argue about that. Republicans, as well as Democrats, can support a reasonable renewal and expansion of the Children's Health Insurance Program. But this is such a massive expansion that the Democrats found themselves in a bind.
Phil Gingrey: “Unfortunately, their only input into this CHAMP legislation, as the Democrats originally phrased it in their acronym…”
On the recordOctober 30, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the CHAMP legislation and its implications for the Children's Health Insurance Program.
Share
More from Phil Gingrey
Feb 27, 2013
To me, it seems abundantly clear that this Administration unilaterally decided to ignore the Nuclear Waste Policy Act
Jul 7, 2013
We have seen this administration continually use almost coercive methods to aid implementation of the law.
Jun 3, 2013
Our Secretary of State has made it abundantly clear to me that this amendment is not necessary, and that the EAC indeed has outlived its usefulness.
May 14, 2019
I thank Jim for yielding some of his time. Primarily, I will report on the Congressional Study Groups program. As a Member, I had the honor of co-chairing the Congressional Study Group on Germany for, I think, 4 years. It was absolutely…





