Political Quotes

Paul Coverdell: I am introducing today, with Senators Landrieu and Dorgan, the Property Owners Access to Justice Act of 1997, a bill to…

On the recordSeptember 23, 1997
I am introducing today, with Senators Landrieu and Dorgan, the Property Owners Access to Justice Act of 1997, a bill to simplify access to the Federal courts for private property owners whose rights may have been injured by government action. The fifth amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides individuals with protection from having their property taken by the Government. The Constitution requires that when private property is taken for a public purpose, the property owner must be compensated. However, property owners seeking protection of their rights are frequently frustrated by endless bureaucratic delay and countless procedural hurdles that prevent them from having their day in court. They are told they must resolve all of their State court remedies and all of their administrative remedies before their case is ripe for a hearing in Federal court. Unfortunately, most property owners cannot afford the long and often fruitless process of resolving all possible remedies before their case is ripe. This process can mean years of court battles and tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees just to win the right to have the merits of the case heard in Federal court. The hurdles are so oppressive that one study concluded less than 6 percent of takings claims filed during the 1980's were ever deemed ripe for Federal court adjudication.
Said by
Paul Coverdell
Georgia

Editor's note · Context

Introducing the Property Owners Access to Justice Act of 1997 to simplify access to Federal courts for property owners.

Share

More from Paul Coverdell

Feb 29, 2000

Why should we do that? This is a classic example: Let's tell them what is important to them. You think it is important it only be for college. I think it ought to be up to the family to decide where and when they have a special need. Maybe…

govinfo.gov
Mar 29, 2000

Mr. President, first I thank the Senator from Texas for her perseverance in pursuing relief of the marriage tax penalty on so many millions of Americans. I have several general comments to make about this proposal at this time. Again…

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 2000

I have offered a substitute that I think embraces the spirit of the amendment of the Senator from California. The main differences are three. It is a little broader in scope. It acknowledges the problem of weapons in schools. It deals with…

govinfo.gov
May 11, 2000

When the Act requires yarn to be ``wholly formed'' in the United States, am I correct that the intention of the managers is to require that all processes necessary to convert fibers into yarns-- i.e., spinning, extruding--be performed in…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation