I had an interesting presentation here this morning, built around what apparently is going to be a Presidential campaign theme, putting families first. Mr. President, we cannot but be reminded of a book written by President Clinton and Vice President Gore which was a prelude to the 1992 Presidential campaign. The book, Mr. President, was entitled ``Putting People First,'' very, very familiar to this new theme we have heard here this morning, putting families first. I will read from this publication, ``Putting People First,'' now almost some 4 years old, a very interesting piece on page 15 of ``Putting People First.'' It says, ``Middle-class tax fairness.'' Now, this was the President's ``contract with America,'' putting people first. He says, ``Middle-class tax fairness: We will lower the tax burden on middle-class Americans by asking the very wealthy to pay their fair share.'' I repeat, ``We will lower the tax burden on middle-class Americans * * * Middle-class taxpayers will have a choice between a children's tax credit or a significant reduction in their income tax rate.'' It goes on to say, on page 101 ``Treat families right,'' in this book entitled ``Put People First.'' It says, ``Grant additional tax relief to families with children.''
Paul Coverdell: “I had an interesting presentation here this morning, built around what apparently is going to be a Presidential campaign…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the theme of putting families first in relation to a book by President Clinton and Vice President Gore.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
Mr. President, first I thank the Senator from Texas for her perseverance in pursuing relief of the marriage tax penalty on so many millions of Americans. I have several general comments to make about this proposal at this time. Again…
I want to speak briefly to the Bingaman amendment. First, I associate myself with the remarks of the Senator from Delaware. The Senator talked about the train that could and the train that will, but it will not if we adopt the Bingaman…
I have offered a substitute that I think embraces the spirit of the amendment of the Senator from California. The main differences are three. It is a little broader in scope. It acknowledges the problem of weapons in schools. It deals with…
I will be very brief. The Senator from Virginia and I have an honorable disagreement about how the Federal Government ought to respond to being a better partner in education. But the one issue that I would take some exception to and would…





