We are losing to both the violent Jihad and to the cultural Jihad.

Cultural jihad is winning when the administration censors training documents and lecturers according to sensitivity so that they cannot describe radical Islamists with any reference to the religious ideology which is the primary bond that…

It is vital that the United States Congress undertake a thorough no-holds-barred review of the long global war in which we are now engaged with radical Islamists.

They believe that Islamic law is superior to all other law, and that the rest of us ultimately have to basically yield to Islamic law.

To start with that notion--I mean, this whole idiocy that you can't talk honestly about the nature of the people who are trying to kill you strikes me as utterly irrational.

Congress ought to explore reestablishing the USIA as an independent agency.

Cultural jihad is winning when the Department of Defense describes a terrorist attack at Fort Hood as workplace violence.

Congress is going to have to reform those things because they are written into the law.

I think the core thing to understand here, and this goes way beyond the current administration.

We are going to have allies that make us uncomfortable.

Cultural Jihad is winning when the President refers to 'random' killings in Paris when they were clearly the actions of Islamist terrorists.

We need a similar dialogue, and it needs to transcend Democrat, Republican, and be an American dialogue.