I rise in support of a constitutional amendment to balance the budget. The United States of America is the demonstration project of modern civilization whose purpose is to prove that free people can govern themselves without the supervision of monarchs or dictators. Our pilot project has entered its third century, but is still an infant on the amortization table of history. Our success is not assured simply because we profess noble purposes and lofty ideals. Others have shared these dreams, yet they have failed. The energy force of all governments is power--the power to take and the power to give. Democracies take in the form of taxes and give in the form of spending. Although taxes and spending are the opposite sides of the same coin, one would assume that the law of averages would dictate they would equally appear when the coin is tossed. For the last 25 years, however, the coin has always landed on the spend side, because Congress has the ability to load the coin and to spend more than it receives. In fact, we have done this for so long that some would elevate it to a religious requirement with the perverted admonition, 'It is more blessed to give than to receive.' I believe this debate about a balanced budget amendment is really a debate about preserving our Republic.
Nathan Deal: “I rise in support of a constitutional amendment to balance the budget. The United States of America is the demonstration…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting a constitutional amendment to balance the budget during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Nathan Deal
I have one final speaker. I am pleased to yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. McCaul). Mr. McCAUL of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of this resolution to fight childhood cancer. I would like to especially…
yes, it is. I would add that, under the bill, ``identical'' means that the language in the State law is substantially the same as that in the listed sections of Federal law and that any differences in language are not material. This is…
that also includes the right to conclude; is that correct? The Acting CHAIRMAN. That is correct.
if we want to talk about who won and who lost, let us talk about who did win. It was not special interests. It was those who qualify under the Family Opportunity Act who for the first time for families with disabled children who may be up…





