Yes, it is. I would add that, under the bill, ``identical'' means that the language in the State law is substantially the same as that in the listed sections of Federal law and that any differences in language are not material. This is important to understand.
Share
More from Nathan Deal
I believe I have 30 seconds remaining, and I would have the right to close. I would reserve it with no other speakers that I intend to use.
Unless there is someone in opposition to it, I would claim the time in opposition, even though I am not opposed to it. I am not sure that Mr. Waxman and I are on the same position on the amendment.
That also includes the right to conclude; is that correct? The Acting CHAIRMAN. That is correct.
You would not advocate repealing that law and giving it back to the States, I would assume?
Other voices in this conversation
