Political Quotes

Nathan Deal: I would yield myself 1 minute. Mr. Chairman, I must rise in opposition to the amendment. I believe that Mr. Waxman is…

On the recordMarch 8, 2006
I would yield myself 1 minute. Mr. Chairman, I must rise in opposition to the amendment. I believe that Mr. Waxman is well-intentioned in the amendment language that he has offered, and it is a matter of perspective as to whether or not this amendment would cure or would create more problems. It is my opinion that it would do the latter. The last thing that any of us want, I think, is to create anything that will create more bureaucratic wrangling between the States and the Federal Government and pointing of fingers back and forth in a time of disaster, and especially in an event such as a terrorist attack or something that would contaminate our food supply. I believe the language we have just adopted in the Rogers amendment, which requires that the Secretary of HHS consult with the Secretary of Homeland Security and certify that this bill does not in any way impinge on or interfere with the ability to deal with a threat to public health, is an adequate safeguard. I think this amendment is unnecessary. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Nebraska (Mr. Terry).
Said by
Nathan Deal
Georgia

Share

More from Nathan Deal

May 18, 2005

Yes, I can give the gentlewoman that assurance. I am sympathetic to the issue that she is concerned with. Our committee is more than willing to work with my colleague and her staff to try to coordinate that. We simply do not think that we…

govinfo.gov
Nov 17, 2005

In the manager's amendment, we provide for a GAO study that would authorize the Secretary to delay the implementation of the new reimbursement structure if the study finds that the average payment rates to pharmacists for drugs under the…

govinfo.gov
May 10, 2006

I believe I have 30 seconds remaining, and I would have the right to close. I would reserve it with no other speakers that I intend to use.

govinfo.gov
Oct 18, 2007

I would suggest there are five. First of all, we should put the poorest children at the front of the line. That means we should require States actually to enroll 90 percent of their SCHIP and Medicaid-eligible children under 200 percent of…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation