I would suggest there are five. First of all, we should put the poorest children at the front of the line. That means we should require States actually to enroll 90 percent of their SCHIP and Medicaid-eligible children under 200 percent of the poverty line before they start enrolling children at higher income levels. Two, no families with incomes above 250 percent of the Federal poverty level should be eligible for Federal SCHIP funds. States that want to go above that should feel free to do so with their own funds; but hardworking, tax-paying families in the Midwest and the Southeast shouldn't be forced to subsidize the health care for children and families in the richer States who are making over $82,000 per year. Third, no Federal SCHIP funds for adults other than pregnant women beginning in 2009.
Nathan Deal: “I would suggest there are five. First of all, we should put the poorest children at the front of the line. That means we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing principles for a bipartisan extension of the SCHIP program.
Share
More from Nathan Deal
I rise to join my colleague in support of S. 793, the Traumatic Brain Injury Act of 2008. This legislation reauthorizes important grant programs, which assist States, territories, and the District of Columbia in establishing and expanding…
Surely as our ranking member on the the Health Subcommittee, you know on dual eligibles they are signed up under the program, as the law provides. So dual eligibles are included. Mr. Speaker, I will reclaim my time. The gentleman has more…
today I pay tribute to a close personal friend, a mentor, a dedicated public servant and a respected attorney, Robert E. ``Bob'' Andrews of Gainesville, Georgia. Bob was many things to many people: a devoted husband who was always…
I am sure there are arguments that can be made that it does some good, but Mexico continues to be the main source of illegal drugs into this country. And if we are doing something, it has not been as effective as it should have been.





