Doug Collins

We're showing you, actually using documents here, how can we firm up our elections, how can we do away with foreign interference, how can we do that. It's about priorities.

So I don't know what your plans are. You all can do whatever you want, but stop wasting our time and just do it.

It appears that we have an issue with who got elected President. And we thought the Mueller investigation would solve this for us, and it really did not.

Because, at the end of the day, the Mueller document, in spite of his standing up in statements, stated there was no collusion.

As members of the Judiciary Committee, it is appropriate to examine why the test of time has exposed Roe as a failure in the viable judicial precedent.

It is impossible to imagine the framers intending the right of privacy to eclipse one of the self-evident, unalienable rights that motivated the birth of our Nation.

The special counsel closed up shop without giving Democrats anything to deliver to their base.

There was no collusion. There was no obstruction charge. There is nothing here.

Arbitration provides consumers a simpler, cheaper, faster path to justice than the judicial system does.

I mean, I do not deny the political aspect of this.

When one of the police organizations heard about this letter, this was their reaction: 'Well, that is a slap in the face.' It is tone deaf.

There is such a thing as moving too fast where you actually undercut your own authority.

I have no problem with looking into these issues, none at all. But when we put one bill on the floor and we send this to the Attorney General during Police Week, I don't think there is a person on the other side of this dais should say…

I do not deny the political aspect of this.

Well, that is a slap in the face. It is tone deaf.

A hundred and forty-four officers died in the line of duty. This year over 86 have died in the line of duty.

But what we did have from the chairman, and I ask unanimous consent that it be entered into the record, is a letter from the chairman and several of our members to General Barr wanting to talk about police-involved shootings and unarmed…

The burden is on the committee to substantially narrow this aspect of its request.

We have rushed instead in this body--as my colleague from Colorado, Mr. Buck, so eloquently stated, we have rushed to invoke the court's jurisdiction by hurriedly issuing a poorly drafted and overbroad subpoena.

A deliberative body like the Judiciary Committee commands respect, but only when it conducts itself in a respectable manner.

there is such a thing as moving too fast where you actually undercut your own authority.

Let's be very clear. There is only one reason and one reason only at this point we are not being able to fulfill our constitutional role of oversight, and that is Chairman's demands that were played out yesterday.

What really bothers me today is the travesty of what happened to minority rights yesterday.

Instead, we go back to a circus political stunt to say we want it to look like an impeachment hearing because they won't bring impeachment proceedings.

Timing does not trump minority rights.