We have issued those, and we don't have standards for them fully adopted. Is that also correct?

But that doesn't answer my question. They promised us that, again, a year ago the fall, then the end of the year, then the beginning of the year it would be early this year.

He is interfering with a lawful investigation of an investigative committee of Congress.

They probably could have done it at a fraction of the cost and far less hassle, wouldn't you both agree, if you are just going to do a flash pass?

We will continue to use every lawful means, every process, due process.

This is a fundamental right of the investigative arm of the House of Representatives. That's the Committee on Investigations and Oversight.

What they were trying to do is set the premise. First, they said that the violence in Mexico was due to guns coming from the United States.

You just testified that you are still finalizing the standards for the readers?

The cost to the taxpayers in financing this entire fiasco is just totally unacceptable--a $3.2 billion program which is rife with problems.

He has contempt for the people of the United States and the Department of Justice by his actions today.

I really don't give a hill of beans what's in any -- any magazine article. My job as a representative of the people, when taxpayers' money has been used to develop a plan and to end up with guns being transported into Mexico, given to drug…

You have been in final clearance for years. If this was a plane, we would have run out of fuel and crashed and burned.