There is another reason why the Postal Service needs revenue, and it is to be able to do their job, a better job with respect to intercepting and stopping the movement of these highly toxic chemicals.

There must be some way we can incentivize these folks.

In order to put someone into treatment, I have to have a treatment to put them into.

It is rare that we have a hearing that is both illuminating and terrifying, and this is really both.

I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Under the previous order, all postcloture time has expired. The question is, Will the Senate advise and…

That is not my question.

I am more convinced than ever as we wrap this up.

Even choirs need to be preached to.

We want to have additional postal revenues in order that they can, among other things, modernize their mail processing centers.

I am going to be asking for the record if there are any amendments, any changes that should be made to the STOP Act.

I said earlier this is all hands on deck. I am an old Navy guy.

All right. And 'we' is 'us.' Give us some advice.

How are we able to do that in Delaware and not in other States? Why is that?

In 2015, the EPA finished its congressionally mandated review of the 2008 ozone health standard.

A wall would fix that pollution problem with Mexico, a big wall.

Our Nation's clean air protections have allowed our Country to make remarkable progress.

Unfortunately, after reviewing S. 263 and S. 452, I concluded these bills significantly weaken the existing Clean Air Act.

I would be delighted to work with you on that.

On similar ground, do you think it makes sense for the EPA to consider cost when establishing a health standard?

The Clean Air Act is one of the Nation's most effective environmental statutes. Simply put, the Clean Air Act works.

It is my understanding that EPA's own Scientific Review Board determined that 75 ppb, the 2008 ozone standard, was not strong enough to protect public health as early as 2007, is that correct?

These delays only serve to harm the 6.3 million children in this Country who have asthma today.

Arbitrarily delaying implementation of the 2015 ozone NAAQS to 2025 would leave the 2008 standard which has been found to be outdated.

I think the priority needs to be, first, the health.

It is little like taking your children to the doctor to see if they are sick and the doctor waiting 10 years to call you back with the test results.