Frankly I was outraged when President Clinton issued that executive order revoking President Reagan's historic executive order on federalism issued in 1987. President Reagan's executive order provided many protections for and reflected great deference to State and local governments. By stark contrast, President Clinton's new executive order, issued without prior consultation with State and local governments, betrays and repudiates an 11-year tradition of trust and mutual consultation between the States and the executive branch. In its place, the order laid out the groundwork for an unprecedented Federal power grab in virtually every area of policy previously reserved to the States under the 10th amendment.
Joel Hefley: “Frankly I was outraged when President Clinton issued that executive order revoking President Reagan's historic executive…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing President Clinton's executive order on federalism during House debate.
Share
More from Joel Hefley
let me correct just one thing. The gentleman makes a very good argument. By the way, we should have dealt with this at budget time; there is no question about that. The way this amendment is crafted, it does not reduce high-priority…
Mr. Skelton, thank you so much. You have been such a good friend over the years. And I also would be remiss if I did not thank Mr. Ortiz, Solomon Ortiz. He and I have been teammates leading the Readiness Committee but before that leading…
a children's health agency has reportedly diverted Federal funds to a study of the sexual predilections of aging men. Now, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has provided more than $137,000 for a 3-year study to…
Mr. Chairman, I will admit that I offer this amendment with a great deal of ambivalence because the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Taylor) takes a back seat to no one when it comes to trying to get control of the spending of our…





