I am aware we could do a reach-back amendment and do it later. However, I would rather do it now, when it is closer to the actual subject matter, than trying to amend it into the total of the overall bill. This would relate directly to what I am trying to get at rather than the total figures at the end of the bill. And I do not plan to take much time with it, if the gentleman does not.
Discussing the timing of amendments during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Joel Hefley
Let me correct just one thing. The gentleman makes a very good argument. By the way, we should have dealt with this at budget time; there is no question about that. The way this amendment is crafted, it does not reduce high-priority…
There is an old saying in the gentleman from Texas' home State, when you have struck oil, stop drilling. And you have struck oil here, and we are not objecting. Trying to take care of our veterans in the best way we possibly can is not a…
I would just encourage an ``aye'' vote on this amendment. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Hefley). The question was taken…
I just lost my $5 here. I don't want to take any more time because I know this is going to, we need to go ahead and get on with this thing. But I think we do have a serious opportunity here to do some really good things. And there are some…
Other voices in this conversation
