Let me correct just one thing. The gentleman makes a very good argument. By the way, we should have dealt with this at budget time; there is no question about that. The way this amendment is crafted, it does not reduce high-priority programs as well as low-. It allows the administration to determine where the 1 percent comes from; and, hopefully, they have got the good sense to not take it out of the high-priority programs. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Joel Hefley: “Let me correct just one thing. The gentleman makes a very good argument. By the way, we should have dealt with this at…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget amendments and their impact on high-priority programs.
Share
More from Joel Hefley
I rise in support of that House Resolution 495 which calls for the expulsion of Representative James A. Traficant, Jr. [...] These counts involved findings that Mr. Traficant engaged in the following acts that did not reflect credibly on…
You said one side of the aisle is not interested in the Ethics Committee proceeding and working. There is enough blame to go around, I have to say. Both sides of the aisles have fouled this process up now. And we need to work together to…
I rise to support H.R. 1588, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004. We are a Nation engaged in an ongoing global war on terrorism. American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines are deployed all over the world in…
Let me just say, I am sorry about the procedure, but this bill has been sitting in these two committees for 2 years. We have a fire season coming up again, and we need to focus all the assets we can. When we have a war and when we have a…





