let me correct just one thing. The gentleman makes a very good argument. By the way, we should have dealt with this at budget time; there is no question about that. The way this amendment is crafted, it does not reduce high-priority programs as well as low-. It allows the administration to determine where the 1 percent comes from; and, hopefully, they have got the good sense to not take it out of the high-priority programs. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Joel Hefley: “let me correct just one thing. The gentleman makes a very good argument. By the way, we should have dealt with this at…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget amendments and their impact on high-priority programs.
Share
More from Joel Hefley
there is an old saying in the gentleman from Texas' home State, when you have struck oil, stop drilling. And you have struck oil here, and we are not objecting. Trying to take care of our veterans in the best way we possibly can is not a…
You said one side of the aisle is not interested in the Ethics Committee proceeding and working. There is enough blame to go around, I have to say. Both sides of the aisles have fouled this process up now. And we need to work together to…
I have an amendment in here that is trying to get rid of the bureaucratic difficulty we have of getting firefighting assets of the Air Force Reserve focused on a fire early on. The law right now, as it is being interpreted, says that you…
I would just encourage an ``aye'' vote on this amendment. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Hefley). The question was taken…





