the gentleman may be absolutely right. It may be able to be worded much better, but if he and I believe the same thing, that we do not want a standing army, the way for us to assure that is to let this amendment go ahead and progress. I have committed to the gentleman that I will work with him as we go through this process and try to get the wording in a way that we can both agree on. But if we kill the amendment here today on the floor of the House, then there is no opportunity for us to do that.
Joel Hefley: “the gentleman may be absolutely right. It may be able to be worded much better, but if he and I believe the same thing…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the concept of a standing army.
Share
More from Joel Hefley
today the U.S. military is deployed around the world in support of the war against terrorism, the efforts to rebuild Afghanistan and Iraq, and defense of the American homeland and U.S. interests abroad. H.R. 4200, the National Defense…
Mr. Chairman, I will admit that I offer this amendment with a great deal of ambivalence because the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Taylor) takes a back seat to no one when it comes to trying to get control of the spending of our…
I think the gentleman from Maryland has a good point, this is a small amount, and it is somewhat symbolic. It is saying, when we are trying to get our budget back in balance, we need to cut wherever we can cut. But even though I would say…
Mr. Skelton, thank you so much. You have been such a good friend over the years. And I also would be remiss if I did not thank Mr. Ortiz, Solomon Ortiz. He and I have been teammates leading the Readiness Committee but before that leading…





