I would then like to say the question is when, how much, under what circumstances, who pays, and what are the consequences of all of those decisions.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of policy decisions.
Share
More from William M. Thomas
The question is: Do you believe that this key element, this non-elected board with vast powers----
I thought he said he wanted to make sure the rules were honored, and here clearly he violates the rules that he wants to use to stop us. That is an example of the kind of duplicity that goes on around here. You cannot have it both ways…
Saving taxpayer dollars, cutting costs for the regulated community, and ensuring speedier resolution of cases are all a net gain for the voter and our electoral system.
The national health board, dictatorial, stopping all of the change that has been made in the States, controlling the prices, is it really the best choice for the American health system?





