Then the counter was 15. But the 15 years then was accompanied by language which made it an absolute necessity or it would not be approved. So it was not just the 15-year addition. It was additional language which limited the options and then there was a discussion over what is necessary. We got it too desirable. You then came with another sentence which made it impossible for the phrase desirable to work. So the gentleman's characterization that we simply came back with 15 years is not borne out by all the facts as between the staffs. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
William M. Thomas: “Then the counter was 15. But the 15 years then was accompanied by language which made it an absolute necessity or it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing legislative language and amendments during a debate.
Share
More from William M. Thomas
And in addition to that, because one of the things we have tried to do is to take a look at what States and companies are doing in the private sector to get some ideas about whether or not it works, if you take a look at the employer…
I would say to her, it's OK to come forward, to come forward and to tell the truth in this case. The agony that these young men and their families have been put through, I simply cannot describe to you in words.
When you are looking for victims and villains rather than essential causes, it is easy to examine the same set of facts and arrive at diametrically different conclusions.
this is both a substantive discussion and perhaps an illustrative and graphic one of the process that we are operating under. The substance is there is an exciting new technology by which we will be able to recharge satellites' batteries…





